Monday, September 6, 2010

Readings

[Note: This is inessential reading; this might be tedious even for the small (and kind) audience gathered here, but I wrote it, and enjoyed writing it, so I thought I'd post. Feel free to skip and move on to your next "reading" project.]


Concertina wire, twice,
the words: entered
my field of vision: once
in juvenilia by a general,
secondly, a poem by a
Topekan, a quick learner,
one of the under 40s the
foundation loves.

I am not incarcerated, at
war, or of an imagination
that craves boundaries
or blood, suggested or
shed. All I could hear
was the soft bellowing
of distant music, that
might have been
birdsong.

_____

The Englishman responsible
for the idea: image-nation,
told me a story in three
pages of a Japanese brush,
a French swimming pool,
a Cambodian, arthritic
swimmer & her husband:
I did not weep nor smile,
but the minutes were
strong ones that passed
by:  both noticed & un-
noticed. I can attest to
them but did not count.

_____

A white H on a blue field,
& no need to turn is a
blessing. The sounds of
ambulance, firetruck,
& cruiser are distinct
but can be read in
several ways: help,
trouble, prayer, relief,
fear:       or just go
without notice.

In the rearview: the letters
arrange themselves, even
without the noise, but
staring straight ahead
familiarity fades.  Luckily,
when need arrives
sound can be enough,
& with any luck, you’ll
never need to know
anyway.

_____

From what I can recall:
Villon’s songs were in
one voice, but several
characters, while Hugo
always sounded like
several people speaking
at once. Or was it the
other way around?

_____

And then there’s work:
Winthrop, Bradstreet,
Taylor, Edwards,
Franklin, Paine,
Wheatley, Irving,
Poe, Hawthorne,
Melville: All
weighing in their
own way these
next three weeks.
_____

A red-eye jet, I must
assume, just shook
my sleeping house
(metonymy?)
not enough to
wake the dreamers.

Isn’t noticing this
a kind of reading,
too?
_____

There is a poem that a
certain Laureate likes
that de-grades a gathering
of homeless, fire-warmers 
by suggesting that a poem
will make readers see
the cold they inhabit
more clearly after  they
finishing reading.  The
argument is actually
the poet’s, but I blame
the elder too, because
he didn’t even correct
him for failing to mention
the way the exhalations
of each man mixed with
the others & while
one choked a bit from
too much smoke or
from too many nights
outside, or too much
exhaust from the
commuters as
they pass by (not
reading a poem
but listening to a
book on tape about
global markets or the
death of journalism)
the others rotated
just enough that
he could catch his
breath before
the smoke
engulfed
his lungs.

_____

I must confess to
poly-reading,
there must ten or
twelve cracked
spines now waiting
to be shelved &
pushed back to-
gather with the
masses: a mystery,
 the  other halves of
 two collections of stories,
the rest of Stevens,
Kumin, Kenyon,
& too much Wright.

_____

Finally, a dying man
chooses, carefully,
what he reads:
those books
remaining, a
friend’s last
novel,  prayer
or curse filled
emails & online
posts, but mostly
people collecting
as culture, what he
has spent his life’s
years waging
some kind of
war on, to make
peace with an
answerless cosmos,
he writes last
dispatches from
that tropic few
 hard-living
critics survive.

There is so much
left to read,
& he keeps
adding more.

_____

There is more
that I could tell,
but, after all,
one must protect
at least some
of  his sources.

2 comments:

  1. My favorites: the old argument about the homeless men poem resurfaces, poly-reading (I'm guilty as well), and the red-eye jet. The imagery there is nice and I like the tone of that stanza.

    My ruling: not tedious, but thought-provoking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Neither tedious nor inessential. There is something melancholy, I guess, in our quest to read more than can be covered in a single lifetime. One of many on the 'not fair' list.

    I wish this were linked with references to specific pieces, where they exist, because I'm way, way too far from the literati to get the references. ;)

    Oh, and you can talk about 'youngest child' neurosis any day, but I'll see your youngest child & raise you an only. (pun intended)

    ReplyDelete